• Slideshow Image 1
  • Slideshow Image 2
  • Slideshow Image 3
  • Slideshow Image 4
  • Slideshow Image 5
  • Slideshow Image 6
sex hikayeleri rokettube

Philly City Council at Large Candidate Forum

All 9 Candidates for City Council-At-Large Seats
From Left to Right: Malcom Lazin, Joe McColgan, Elmer Money, Dennis O’Brien, Steve Odabashian, David Oh, Frank Rizzo (Incumbent), Michael Untermeyer, not pictured: Al Taubenberger

Thursday night I had the opportunity to attend a meet the Republican candidates running for City Council at-large and the two Republican candidates for Mayor event hosted by the Loyal Opposition and Philadelphia Tea Party Patriots in the beautifully decorated hall of the German Society.

The moderator for this event was Larry Mendte,  who deftly handled the questions and candidates throughout the evening. You can read his thoughts on the debate at The Philly Post

There are currently 7 At-Large council seats up for grabs. The candidates are vying to be one of the top five vote getters in the upcoming Republican primary election; those selected will face five democrat candidates in the fall. The top seven vote getters in the November election will become the newest At-Large City Council members. Of those seven seats, two are reserved for the minority party, which happens to be the GOP.  The two incumbent Republican at-large council members are vulnerable thanks to an energized faction within the GOP and the DROP scandal.  Scanning the Committee of 70 City Council Districts and Candidates at-a-glance page, it is staggeringly apparent how much ground the GOP has lost in this city. 7 out of 10 Districts are fielding Democrat candidates exclusively. In addition, the Democrats are fielding 14 At-Large candidates to the Republican’s 9 candidates.

With this in mind, I was absolutely stunned when the incumbent Republican city council-at-large councilman, Frank Rizzo, Jr abruptly left after the candidate introductions. The Republican party barely has a footprint within Philadelphia and the incumbent Republican candidate has no wish to speak to his constituents.  Our city and the GOP cannot afford such arrogance.

The debate moved on to more meatier topics, and there were a few down the line questions asked, such as, would you vote for Marian Tasco if she were to run for council president? Candidate David Oh signaled his support of Marian by stating he might vote for her depending on other choices she has made outside of her decision to collect on DROP.  Surprisingly there was a mixed response to collective bargaining, with David Oh clearly signaling his support for collective bargaining. The level of squirming was amusing to behold when the candidates were asked to state their support or rejection of a ‘no new tax pledge’. I don’t blame them, I wouldn’t be comfortable pledging something so broad based without 100% certainty. Most of the candidates in the forum have been around the election block before and are too experienced to bite. The candidates were asked if elected what would be the first piece of legislation they would push as councilmen. The responses ranged from term limits to crime reform and tax reform legislation.  No one offered any out of the box responses to that question.

The Republican part has such a tenuous political footprint in this city due to the inept leadership of Vito Canuso and Mike Meehan. The best result of the upcoming November election would be replacing the two current incumbent  At-Large seats with Pitbulls.  I want candidates who will use their seats to challenge the status quo and publicly question the actions of the city council and not to roll over and play dead for four years. I came looking for pitbulls at this debate and was surprised to discover 4 candidates that might fit my requirements. I hope to finalize my endorsements within a week or two.

As per my usual, I did manage to capture video of the debate. I apologize for the quality of the video as I was using my iPhone camera without a tripod.  The first video captures the candidates thoughts on pension funding.

Now this peaked my interest – The candidates thoughts on SB1 or School Choice Act:

It says a lot about the lack of character of a candidate when they leave a debate early or simply do not show up as was the case of Karen Brown. This left mayoral candidate, John Featherman in a one to one interview with the moderator,  Larry Mendte:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


8 responses to “Philly City Council at Large Candidate Forum

  1. Joel Farber

    To me the biggest issue here is school choice I feel its the only way to make the children most important unlike now when the teachers union and the administration are most important

  2. Joel Farber

    BTW I know I can vote for more than one but as of right now I will vote for Denny and Denny alone

  3. says:

    I’d like to correct your opinion that I signaled my support of Marian Tasco for City Council President. I did not and I will not make a commitment either way. I said I would have to be electd first and then I’d have to see who is running. I do not know if she will be a candidate for Council President and I do not know who else may be running. I believe the public has very little confidence in the statements and promises of politicans and political candidates. Therfore, I try not to go around making empty promises and taking meaningless pledges. For all those who pledged that they will not support Tasco, are they signaling that they support Darrel Clarke?

    • Tania


      Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on this post. I rechecked my videos and notes regarding the question directed to the candidates in reference to Marian Tasco and her DROP support. My exact notes on your response ‘ D. OH – might vote for Marian Tasco…depending upon choices’. The impression was that there was room for consideration of Marian Tasco as City Council President. Clearly this was a hypothetical question based on the presumption that the candidates would be successful in their city council at large campaign.

      I agree with you that the public has very little confidence in public officials making empty pledges, but they also are looking at political leaders to provide clear answers to their concerns. Are you that candidate, David?

      Thank you again for clearing up any lingering confusion there may be on this issue.

      • says:

        Yes, I am. I am careful in thought and word… and I am honest. There needs to be a balance between ideal and practical. The degree of each may be disputed. But a candidate who is dishonest is neither idealistic nor practical. Check you notes and then check and see who was honest and who was not. That will be easy to tell in the next few weeks.

  4. Dee

    What did you think of Joe McColgan. I live in one of those districts that is uncontested by a Republican nominee and I am really distressed by that fact. I just moved here and am slowly becoming aware of what is going on around here. Marian Tasco is the Council member and I don’t think she does a good job, and she is running without a Republican challenger. She has been here for ages and needs to go. What do I do about that. Do I have to wait four years to get rid of her?

    • Tania


      I have expressed my disgust with the Philly GOP’s inability to groom challengers to the Dems running. Sometimes, I want to yell at the citizens of Philly for continually voting for more of the same. I’ve come to realize, what choice do they really have at the voting booth? Not having two robust political parties hurts the citizens of this city.

  5. says:

    A weight could be decreased not merely by the actual diet or work out but additionally because of the natural product branded Garcinia Cambogia.
    Pay for your gym membership in advance to make sure you utilize it.
    Garcinia Cambogia it is called the lipogenesis inhibitor because it is
    responsible for slowing down your metabolism of carbohydrates from
    producing fats.

Have Your Say